Due to a high volume of active users and service overload, we had to decrease the quality of video streaming. Premium users remains with the highest video quality available. Sorry for the inconvinience it may cause. Donate to keep project running.
We are currently experiencing technical difficulties with our servers. We hope to have this resolved soon. This issue doesn't affect premium users.
Get Premium
Watch on MixDrop/MyStream
Oops...
Something went wrong
Try again later.
Something went wrong
Try again later.
Here You can choose a playback server.
The Name Of Rose
Description
In the 14th century, William of Baskerville, an intellectually nonconformist Franciscan friar, and his apprentice travel to an isolated abbey to investigate a series of mysterious deaths.
In the 14th century, William of Baskerville, an intellectually nonconformist Franciscan friar, and his apprentice travel to an isolated abbey to investigate a series of mysterious deaths.
Actors:
Volker Prechtel,
Emil Feist,
David Furtwaengler,
Feodor Chaliapin Jr.,
Franco Marino,
Carlo Bianchino,
F. Murray Abraham
Volker Prechtel
9 August 1941, Hopfen am See, Bavaria, Germany
Emil Feist
7 January 1924
David Furtwaengler
Feodor Chaliapin Jr.
6 October 1905, Moscow, Russian Empire [now Russia]
Franco Marino
Carlo Bianchino
F. Murray Abraham
24 October 1939, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Country:
United States
COMMENTS (0)
Sort by
Newest
Newest
Oldest
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
July 01, 2004
A spiritual thriller that holds up thanks to its rich themes and great acting
July 01, 2004
How you accept an English monk with a Scottish accent and the mind of a Sherlock Holmes is the question.
January 01, 2000
This real monastery looks as if it were designed by the artist M. C. Escher.
July 23, 2004
the window dressing is not enough to buoy the principle acting
April 19, 2016
...a misbegotten adaptation that rarely manages to justify its very existence.
August 02, 2011
For labyrinth-lovers...a thoughtful and entertaining murder mystery predicated on intellectual debate. [Blu-ray]
May 26, 2006
It's really a decent exploitation film disguised as a proper art film.
August 31, 2016
Umberto Eco seems unduly dismissive of a film that had to excise his postmodern trappings and scholarly sidebars. But it hasn't just been stripped down to a tawdry whodunit. Here, albeit in a streamlined way, the whydunit matters as much, if not more.

